> And speaking of XHTML 1.0, I was surprised to also find a lot of > presentational attributes still left in the table-related elements > (table, tr, th, td, col etc), even in strict. Surely width, border, > cellspacing, cellpadding, valign, halign could have been expunged from > strict? >
True, but unlike 'row' and 'col' for textarea which are required, all attributes you have mentioned are implied [1]. What makes these different? I agree that there should be NO presentation attributes in XHTML strict, but if we are to have some why would they be required? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd Jough ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
