On 5 Oct 2006, at 12:16, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
>be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect. The
>one you describe included; surely a vCard or other microformat is more
>appropriate - the _definition_  of a particular company is a difficult
>concept to define, but I'm fairly sure its not their contact details!


The fact that people abuse a markup component isn't a reason to deprecate
it. Tables are without doubt the most-abused markup component going, yet
nobody in their right mind would want future versions of (X)HTML to
deprecate them, as they are essential for their intended purpose.

I agree completely that definition lists should under no circumstances be
used for the purpose described. If anything, such information would
actually make more sense in a table... if it was marked up correctly of
course, including microformats :-)

Given that the post to which you were responding spoke of <dl>s "work[ing]
well for displaying business listings from a database", the fact that
database records are held in tables might have given a clue as to how they
could best be marked up.

Next week, how to do a calendar using unordered lists ;-)

Regards,

Nick.

P.S. Sorry if the formatting of the quote comes out strange, I'm not sure
how this webmail system works, and my client's firewall won't let me get
mail out any other way.
-- 
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to