Kay Smoljak wrote: > not be used for, behaviour. I've been using Suckerfish menus for the > past couple of years, because they are simple, search engine friendly > and lightweight.
Scripted solutions can be search engine friendly too. > My input: I have used "Revenge of the menubar" from > http://www.brainjar.com/dhtml/menubar/ previously with good results. > The "click to activate dropdown" part takes some getting used to for > people used to the "instant flyaway" dropdowns, but is actually a > good approach, I think. It has the same usability issue that the one Al did a little demo for. Also, "look" and "behavior" are not the only things an author should care for. What about the *markup*? The use of semantic markup, with the least amount of attributes (id, class ...) is - IMO - the most important thing to look for in a menu. --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
