Thierry Koblentz wrote: > Hassan Schroeder wrote: >> Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>>> It was about using SS-I *without* server-side scripting. >> which was exactly my point -- vanilla SSI meets the requirement :-) > And it's a very good point ;-) > I always thought the echo directive didn't work in shtml pages (only > "include"), but it *does*. Let me take that whole thing back :) The original idea was to use an Include to keep the markup in *one place*, right? But if we use the echo directive in that include, it returns the include itself, *not* the document that *hosts* the include, right? So, if I'm right, the approach would not really work with *SS-Includes*, even with vanilla ones ;-) I guess the directive would make more sense in "Templates", like "Dreamweaver templates" and such where content is more "duplicated" than "Included". Does that make sense? --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
