Christian Montoya wrote: >> I guess this is one more reason to never use "htm" or "html", but at >> least "shtml". No? >> What would be the reason for choosing "htm" or "html" for file >> extension? > > Youthful ignorance?
I think so. The only reason I can think of is if these files need to be accessed *directly*, not through a server. --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
