----- Original Message -----
From: "Rahul Gonsalves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Flash is more accessible than CSS?
I don't think there are any incorrect statements here. Flash *can* be
accessible, if done right - is what I have heard. Please do correct me if
I am wrong. The fact that many people *do not* take the time to make it
accessible is a different matter.
Roberto Scano:
*yes* but only in Windows OS and with the use of the <embed> element for a
best support of MSAA.
So, are more accessible flash contents or contents that are offered in plain
html and/or using Web 2.0 technologies?
And when is necessary to use flash instead of other more accessible
technologies?
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
