|
What are the Groups thoughts on ‘trustmarks’? http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/361985/accessibility--are-trustmarks-the-answer.html Are they a waste of money or are they really better than
in-house testing and a paragraph on how the site is accessible? Thanks Emma ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the sender of the e-mail. It is your responsibility to protect your system from viruses and any other harmful code or device. This e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses; However LMUK accepts no liability for any which remain. We may monitor or access any or all e-mails sent to us. ********************************************************************** ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* |
- [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Emma Sax
- RE: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark michael.brockington
- Re: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Tim
- RE: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Emma Sax
- Re: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Patrick H. Lauke
- Re: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Patrick H. Lauke
- RE: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark Christopher Lee
- [WSG] Articles/reasearch/experience of screen... Barney Carroll
- Re: [WSG] Articles/reasearch/experience of sc... David Dorward
- Re: [WSG] Articles/reasearch/experience of sc... Rahul Gonsalves
- Re: [WSG] Articles/reasearch/experience of sc... Rob Kirton
