> Bugger off Segala. These trustmarks really annoy me,
> Just more commerical organisations seeking to make money.

Agreed.  If a large company like O2 hadn't decided to buy into it, it
would have been easier to fob off.  I know I could do a better job in
testing but little old me doesn't have as much clout as a commercial
company with O2 as a client.

> Why not just use the W3C icons or the Cynthia icon tested at the page
> bottom?

It's because of the fact they aren't looked over by humans.  *I* know
they are worthless without this, it's just getting this across to
managers.


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or the sender of the e-mail.

It is your responsibility to protect your system from viruses and any other  
harmful code or device. This e-mail message has been scanned for the presence 
of computer viruses; However LMUK accepts no liability for any which remain. We 
may monitor or access any or all e-mails sent to us.

**********************************************************************



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to