On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:51:11 +0000, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ron Jonk wrote:
>> I've read it before in this list that backgound rendering on xhtml on
>> the body is not always supported for xhtml strict documents.
>
> In XHTML, the BODY isn't "magic" anymore in that it does only take up as
> much space as its (non-floated) content. To be on the safe side, I'd say
> that if you can't guarantee how much content will be there (a
> screenful, half a screen, etc), apply your background to HTML itself,
> not BODY.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> __________________________________________________________
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com
> __________________________________________________________
> Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
> http://webstandards.org/
> __________________________________________________________
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
