Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote: > There's also the empty <span></span> after the text in the link > approach. You can use CSS to make the span show your image over the > text real easy. Do a google search on the technique and you'll find > plenty of examples. I don't remember who came up with it originally, > but besides the extra empty element, its squeaky clean.
IMHO, an IMG element is better than a SPAN as it comes with the following advantages: - it's semantic - it can be printed - it comes with an ALT attribute and it can scale: http://tjkdesign.com/articles/tip_5.asp --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
