Barney Carroll wrote:
I was recently told by an automated accessibility test that my
navigation was not up to scratch because it simply consisted of a plain
ul at its highest level. It penalised me for not having a preceding
heading to give some kind of indication of what the ul was about. Now
I've never seen a navigation marked 'navigation', and even in the most
of eccentric sites I've always been correct in the assumption that the
first list of links with category denominations is some kind of
navigation tool.
I'd like to know what people think about that first of all - does
anybody give headings to their navigation?
Your post really reminded me of an older post that talked about this:
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/ozewai2005/
May I asked which automated accessibility test?
Hope that helps.
Kat
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
