Mike
Therefore your implication that nothing can be added to bare words to
create meaning is simply ridiculous.
Regards,
Mike
More likely it was me being ridiculous! I take on board your point about
the importance of images / video, however surely Google 's understanding is
only from the point of view of words we associate with a picture via a
tagging mechanism ? Therefore words for the bot , rather than words for
the user who in most cases can see the picture and draw on their own
experiences for a definition of what they see.
If I load a picture this afternoon onto a site, a simple jpeg image, will it
know it is a red car, a red sports car or a red alpha romeo, only
kidding.... it's actually a picture of a boy flying a kite. I would be
greatly surprised if we *soon* have picture recognition that sophisticated
and having the ability to provide us with a rich set of semantic detail.
- Rob
http://ele.vation.co.uk
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
