On 09/02/2007, at 2:01 PM, Geoff Pack wrote:



David Dorward wrote:
Geoff Pack wrote:
Yes, for now. But wouldn't it be easier for all us if the browsers
just improved their handling of xml, instead of worrying about html5

and xhtml2?

No, since HTML expresses known semantics and random-XML doesn't.

Surely the semantic meaning is in the actual tag names, not just the
fact that they are standardised. It shouldn't matter as long as it's
understandable. Anyway, you can always re-use as many of the HTML tags
as you want, and make up your own when you need to.

While you can style it, there are more clients then those which are
visual.

You can add multiple CSS stylesheets to an XML document, just like HTML.
Or use can use XSL and transfrom the document into an HTML file with
multiple CSS stylesheets.

I'm not an expert at any of this, btw. What do XHTML2 and HTML5 give us
that we can't do with XML and CSS?

cheers,
Geoff



Semantic meaning is meaning in context, and it's something more complicated than can be contained in just the dictionary definition of a word that you use in a tag name. It doesn't make sense to say that semantics are included in tag names. The grand example of this is layed out in the recent debate about the hr tag.

But, even if you made the (spurious) assumption that semantic meaning can be included in a tag name, it would still require a human to produce the semantics from the tag name. This is okay in one off applications, but in broader applications like search engines, You can't make an assumption like a <menu> tag will contain information about a navigation menu. That <name> will contain a person's name, etc. Semantics is more than just the individual words. It's the meaning of the word in a specific context.

XHTML2 and HTML5 give us more than just set of named tags, they give us a set of agreed upon semantics for those tags, which goes beyond simply their names. This is essential for broad applications of machine parsing.



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to