> > mark: on your own admission there is no possibility
> > that your statements are false,
> > therefore they must be tautological. They appear to
> > be informative, but are not. What is tautological
> > is not full of meaning.
>
> SP: Sorry to disappoint you my friend, what you write
> is not true.
>
> > mark: yes, as you used the word disappointed,
> > which implies a reading of my expectations,
> > and is false.
>
> SP: You are wrong, again, my friend. Sorry.
>
>
> > mark: dogmatic self-confidence is an avoidance of
> > the
> > possibility of being wrong.
>
> SP: Sorry to disappoint you my friend, what you write
> is not true.
>
> Re-read my posts carefully and do not he in a rush to
> reply.
>
> Good luck!
>
Marilyn: Don't you have anything original to offer? We've all
heard that one liner "re-read my posts carefully," e.g., ad nauseum.
So un-----original!
-
>>> email 'unsubscribe listening-l' or 'subscribe listening-l' or 'info listening-l'
>>> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the body of the message
