Hi, Dan. On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Dan Mills wrote: >On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 10:38 AM, Charlie Brady wrote: >> Why is it necessary for a maildir named "foo" to be visible to IMAP? >It is not necessary, it's just something some of us _want_. You don't, >and I am sure you are not alone--that's why I think the current >Maildir++-compatible backend should be left as an option.
I absolutely agree with you on this. We should be able to plug in a Depot for either IMAPdir or Maildir++, depending on the sysadmin's wishes. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | Nil desperandum
