* Andreas Aardal Hanssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >No, binc imapd is wrong in this case. I quote from the spec: > >--- > >A unique name can be anything that doesn't contain a colon (or > >slash) and doesn't start with a dot. > >--- > We read the spec differently. One of your applications is not following > the convention for writing messages. That application is broken.
There is nothing to be read differently. A unique name can be anything that does not contain a ":" and does not start with a ".". > Binc IMAP skips filenames with a messed up format. Wether an application > skips filenames without the required format or not, is not a part of the > spec. Where do you read what the required format is? http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html States two possibilities to create a unique name. Binc imapd uses neither of them, which is fine, because the name just has to be unique. Everybody makes mistakes ;) -- Today is the first day of the rest of our lives. http://www.suug.ch
