On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Hi Stefano (2003.08.25_20:35:50_+0200) >> Andreas, I think that you hit the nail on the head with that patch. I >> have looked at my disk usage graphs, and I see a huge (threefold) >> increace in disk usage while I was using the unpatched 1.2-branch >> binc, and it has subsided back down to the normal values now (slightly >> lower than normal...) >Whoops, spoke too soon. Yes there is a noticible drop in my disk usage >graphs, but No, I caught another hung bincimapd today. Unfortunatly, >it was just before I had to go out, so I only had time do to a >backtrace and save it.
Thanks. I have a good idea in general what the problem is, so I'll try to see if I can produce a patch soon. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something | than to do it poorly."
