Regarding CU5 vs SP1; and how close they are being released... working at a
company that has different processes around Cumulative Updates vs. Service
Packs, we can deploy a Cumulative Update basically during our monthly patching
cycle "it's just an update". But for whatever reason politically internally (I
can't explain it), a "Service Pack" requires sign offs, meetings, scheduling
during planned, announced, and clearly defined "special maintenance window"...
in other words, a CU we can deploy out quickly. but a service pack takes
longer.
I know, and you know, that from a technical standpoint it's not really that big
of a difference. But politically / process-wise ... it's a PIA.
On Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:37 AM, Paul Winstanley <[email protected]>
wrote:
It's something I'm planning to test for sure
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Mawdsley R. <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes – In the Channel 9 video they say they wanted to remove the situation where
people were instead turning to a separate publishing server.. So fingers
crossed, it’ll be just as good after the server pack. From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: 07 May 2015 14:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Is this the faster publishing for
non-persistent VDI support? On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mawdsley R.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Well this CU5 doesn't include fixes to AppV and other things like they’ve said
will be included in SP1.. So I’d assume not. Microsoft ay!
From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of ccollins9
Sent: 07 May 2015 14:06
To: mssms
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Why would they do this? Are we
positive they haven't gone the same route as with exchange 2013 where they call
everything Cumulative Updates? I.e. Exchange 2013 sp1 is also called cu4. Just
seems really odd to release a SP a week after a CU, no?On May 7, 2015 8:57 AM,
"Daniel Ratliff" <[email protected]> wrote:
Awesome, thanks guys. Daniel Ratliff From:[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John Aubrey
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? 14th From:[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? I thought I heard that R2 SP1 was supposed
to be released this week? Was that just CU5? I think I got my wires crossed.
Daniel Ratliff
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
