I see a blog post announcing the new SP is available, but the only link appears to be to a full eval version. There doesn't appear to be a link to download just the SP.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2015/05/14/announcing-the-availability-of-sysctr-2012-r2-configmgr-sp1-and-sysctr-2012-configmgr-sp2.aspx On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Roland Janus <[email protected]> wrote: > Does it break anything? J > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Czechowski > *Sent:* Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015 02:16 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > For now, SCCM CU is still a CU, a collection of hotfixes. The upcoming > service pack will include everything in CU5 as well as other stuff, namely > support for Win10 and a bunch of feature enhancements (see my session > http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ignite/2015/BRK3328 for details on OSD). > You don’t get those with CU5, just bug fixes. > > > > Like Sherry said, it’s easier for most organizations to deploy a CU > because it’s lighter weight, whereas a service pack is a bigger process to > validate and get through change management. We’ll provide documentation on > prereqs and all that at release, but CU5 will not be a prereq. > > > > If your org is really agile and can take the SP right away, awesome, party > down. But if you’ll take a bit to evaluate and plan the upgrade, then apply > CU5 to get the bug fixes in play while you work on the SP. > > > > Aaron > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Mawdsley R. > *Sent:* Friday, May 8, 2015 1:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ignite/2015/BRK3861 > > > > Thankyou > > Rich > > --------------------------------- > > Rich Mawdsley > > SoftwareServices - iSolutions > > University of Southampton > > --------------------------------- > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Henrik Bierbum Bacher > *Sent:* 08 May 2015 08:58 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > Which video did you see this information in? > > > > Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards > > Henrik Bierbum Bacher > System- og supportmedarbejder > > > > Direkte: > > +45 3374 8046 > > E-mail: > > [email protected] > > > > > > PensionDanmark > Langelinie Allé 41 > DK-2100 København Ø > > Telefon: > > +45 3374 8000 > > Fax: > > +45 3374 8080 > > E-mail: > > [email protected] > > Web: > > pension.dk > > > > [image: cid:[email protected]] > > > > [image: cid:[email protected]] > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/pensiondanmark>[image: > cid:[email protected]] <https://twitter.com/pensiondanmark> > > > > üTænk på miljøet, før du printer denne mail og/eller de vedhæftede > dokumenter. / Please consider the impact on the environment before printing > this e-mail and/or the attachment(s) > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Mawdsley R. > *Sent:* 7. maj 2015 15:29 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > Yes – In the Channel 9 video they say they wanted to remove the situation > where people were instead turning to a separate publishing server.. > > > > So fingers crossed, it’ll be just as good after the server pack. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Paul Winstanley > *Sent:* 07 May 2015 14:20 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > Is this the faster publishing for non-persistent VDI support? > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mawdsley R. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Well this CU5 doesn't include fixes to AppV and other things like they’ve > said will be included in SP1.. So I’d assume not. > > > > Microsoft ay! > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9 > *Sent:* 07 May 2015 14:06 > *To:* mssms > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > Why would they do this? Are we positive they haven't gone the same route > as with exchange 2013 where they call everything Cumulative Updates? I.e. > Exchange 2013 sp1 is also called cu4. Just seems really odd to release a SP > a week after a CU, no? > > On May 7, 2015 8:57 AM, "Daniel Ratliff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Awesome, thanks guys. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Aubrey > *Sent:* Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:54 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > 14th > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff > *Sent:* Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:46 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? > > > > I thought I heard that R2 SP1 was supposed to be released this week? Was > that just CU5? > > > > I think I got my wires crossed. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > > > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Bemærk > Denne e-mail og vedhæftede filer er alene forbeholdt den person eller > enhed, som e-mailen er stilet til. E-mail og vedhæftede filer kan indeholde > personlige og fortrolige oplysninger. Er du ikke den rette modtager, bedes > du bemærke, at enhver udbredelse, distribution eller kopiering er forbudt. > Har du modtaget denne e-mail ved en fejl, bedes du underrette afsender om > det straks og derefter slette e-mail og vedhæftede filer fra dit system. > > Disclaimer > This transmission is intended solely for the person or entity to whom it > is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any > dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this transmission by mistake, please let us know and then delete > it from your system. > > > > > > > >
