Wait what?... I’m on R2 CU4. The download for R2 SP1 is 1 MB. So what you’re saying is I need to download SP2 for 2012 first, install that THEN upgrade to R2 SP1? Really?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Pomeroy Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? In the pre-install info it lists some further details: Things to Know Upgrading your installation: If you have a System Center 2012 R2 Configuration Manager installation, you can use the System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SP2 media to install the latest patches and automatically upgrade to System Center 2012 R2 Configuration Manager SP1. New installation: Install System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SP2 first, and then install System Center 2012 R2 Configuration Manager SP1 at the top-tier site of your hierarchy. Both of these installation files are included as part of this evaluation. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:49 AM Steve Whitcher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I see a blog post announcing the new SP is available, but the only link appears to be to a full eval version. There doesn't appear to be a link to download just the SP. http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2015/05/14/announcing-the-availability-of-sysctr-2012-r2-configmgr-sp1-and-sysctr-2012-configmgr-sp2.aspx On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Roland Janus <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Does it break anything? ☺ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Aaron Czechowski Sent: Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015 02:16 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? For now, SCCM CU is still a CU, a collection of hotfixes. The upcoming service pack will include everything in CU5 as well as other stuff, namely support for Win10 and a bunch of feature enhancements (see my session http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ignite/2015/BRK3328 for details on OSD). You don’t get those with CU5, just bug fixes. Like Sherry said, it’s easier for most organizations to deploy a CU because it’s lighter weight, whereas a service pack is a bigger process to validate and get through change management. We’ll provide documentation on prereqs and all that at release, but CU5 will not be a prereq. If your org is really agile and can take the SP right away, awesome, party down. But if you’ll take a bit to evaluate and plan the upgrade, then apply CU5 to get the bug fixes in play while you work on the SP. Aaron From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mawdsley R. Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 1:29 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Ignite/2015/BRK3861 Thankyou Rich --------------------------------- Rich Mawdsley SoftwareServices - iSolutions University of Southampton --------------------------------- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henrik Bierbum Bacher Sent: 08 May 2015 08:58 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Which video did you see this information in? Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Henrik Bierbum Bacher System- og supportmedarbejder Direkte: +45 3374 8046<tel:%2B45%C2%A03374%208046> E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> PensionDanmark Langelinie Allé 41 DK-2100 København Ø Telefon: +45 3374 8000<tel:%2B45%203374%208000> Fax: +45 3374 8080<tel:%2B45%203374%208080> E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Web: pension.dk<http://pension.dk/> [cid:[email protected]] [cid:[email protected]]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/pensiondanmark>[cid:[email protected]]<https://twitter.com/pensiondanmark> üTænk på miljøet, før du printer denne mail og/eller de vedhæftede dokumenter. / Please consider the impact on the environment before printing this e-mail and/or the attachment(s) From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mawdsley R. Sent: 7. maj 2015 15:29 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Yes – In the Channel 9 video they say they wanted to remove the situation where people were instead turning to a separate publishing server.. So fingers crossed, it’ll be just as good after the server pack. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Winstanley Sent: 07 May 2015 14:20 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Is this the faster publishing for non-persistent VDI support? On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mawdsley R. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Well this CU5 doesn't include fixes to AppV and other things like they’ve said will be included in SP1.. So I’d assume not. Microsoft ay! From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of ccollins9 Sent: 07 May 2015 14:06 To: mssms Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? Why would they do this? Are we positive they haven't gone the same route as with exchange 2013 where they call everything Cumulative Updates? I.e. Exchange 2013 sp1 is also called cu4. Just seems really odd to release a SP a week after a CU, no? On May 7, 2015 8:57 AM, "Daniel Ratliff" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Awesome, thanks guys. Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of John Aubrey Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:54 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? 14th From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:46 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] R2 CU5 or R2 SP1? I thought I heard that R2 SP1 was supposed to be released this week? Was that just CU5? I think I got my wires crossed. Daniel Ratliff The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. ________________________________ Bemærk Denne e-mail og vedhæftede filer er alene forbeholdt den person eller enhed, som e-mailen er stilet til. E-mail og vedhæftede filer kan indeholde personlige og fortrolige oplysninger. Er du ikke den rette modtager, bedes du bemærke, at enhver udbredelse, distribution eller kopiering er forbudt. Har du modtaget denne e-mail ved en fejl, bedes du underrette afsender om det straks og derefter slette e-mail og vedhæftede filer fra dit system. Disclaimer This transmission is intended solely for the person or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission by mistake, please let us know and then delete it from your system.
