Deploying it via a SUG should work just fine outside the ADR rules. I know that, on some machines, there are prerequisites for IE11. Are some of your machines maybe missing those?
Prerequisite updates for Internet Explorer <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2847882> 11 *-----------------------------------------------* *Adam Juelich* Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org> Client Management Specialist 920-822-6075 On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Beardsley, James < [email protected]> wrote: > I have them in their own SUG. I’m just trying to figure out what would > cause the client to return that its not required. For example, I spot > checked a few of the ones listed as not required and they have IE10 > installed. What would be the reason that they don’t require the IE11 > upgrade? Is that because its not a security update so its essentially an > optional install? And if that’s true, if I were to deploy this SUG to those > 1100 machines, would IE11 get installed? Or is the client going to continue > to classify it as not required/optional and the update would not get > applied? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juelich, Adam > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:57 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: IE11 not required? > > > > It would all depend on how you have your ADR or Software Update Groups > (SUG) set up. IE11 isn't a Security/Critical Update so it wouldn't > automatically be deployed depending on your ADRs. I generally added it to > a separate SUG and deployed it that way. > > > *-----------------------------------------------* > > *Adam Juelich* > > Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org> > > Client Management Specialist > > 920-822-6075 > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Beardsley, James < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I have the wrong one highlighted. I’m talking about the x64 > update. You’re right, I have no 32-bit. All of our computers are 64-bit. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kent, Mark > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:46 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: IE11 not required? > > > > Because that one is for 32bit machines and you apparently have none. > > > > Mark Kent (MCP) > > Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer > > Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Beardsley, James > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:34 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] IE11 not required? > > > > I’m trying to figure out why ConfigMgr is thinking that there are over > 1100 machines that do not need the IE11 update. Any ideas about what could > be causing that? > > > > > > *James Beardsley |* Firm Technology Group > > Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP > > > > [image: cid:8644FC49-D5C9-45AE-B387-04FAFC0CC7A5] <http://www.dhgllp.com/> > > > ------------------------------ > > *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail is intended only for the addressee > named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or > dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on > its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above > immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you > for your cooperation. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail is intended only for the addressee > named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or > dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on > its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above > immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you > for your cooperation. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail is intended only for the addressee > named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or > dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on > its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above > immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you > for your cooperation. > >
