What are people setting it to. “That depends on your network”. Doh…

 

Still, any pointers, especially with those priority settings.

Is unlimited a good thing at all?

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: Dienstag, 2. Juni 2015 21:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

In general, BITS will attempt to scale back a transfer’s bandwidth usage for
as long as there’s bandwidth contention it can detect , which means “over
the same IGD (Internet Gateway Device)” if the IGD supports the right kind
of traffic counter queries, or “from the same machine” otherwise), and it
will retry-after-xx seconds for many types of outright failures to transfer.

 

In reality – BITS doesn’t get the info from the IGD, so it reverts to using
the NIC speed as it’s available bandwidth which is less than ideal, so it’s
best to throttle it using policy. In our testing we found that BranchCache
worked even better if BITS was throttled – even just slightly.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: 02 June 2015 19:57
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

What is BITS really doing to no get into the way or throttle?

 

What I thought, it basically only knows what else is on the NIC is uses, it
doesn’t know if there is anything else in the pipe.

True?

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Dienstag, 2. Juni 2015 20:08
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

Someone once told me the only way to know how fast you can go on a given
road was to try it too fast once. 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 2:43 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

We talked about this senior… *sigh* so many times. This is a wet dream that
will never come through. 

 

Gonna open up a can of worms with this but here it goes. The ONLY way (and
the “other vendors” will tell you different with their mumbo-jumbo
technology) you can tell how much bandwidth you got on a pipe is to try to
cram as much data through as possible for a period of time. WAN software
today is very sophisticated and will allow bursts etc. for periods of time
depending on certain scenarios.

 

Far more superior people have done many hours on this subject: The A**shole
project, sorry Assolo, got some very interesting reading:
http://netlab-mn.unipv.it/assolo/ 

 

Think of it like answering this question, how fast can you go on a certain
road?

 

//A

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: den 2 juni 2015 09:29
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

Haha – wasn’t expecting that Roland :)

 

My number 1 is – Accurate end-to-end bandwidth calculation..

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 02 June 2015 08:18
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

Oh man!!! :)

 

//A

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 2 juni 2015 08:29
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] BITS

 

Make it work better? Make it work like OneSite? :)

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Montag, 1. Juni 2015 22:25
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [mssms] BITS

 

Hey,

 

Got an upcoming meeting with the BITS dev team, anything that you guys see
missing that should be fixed? Or something that you never found the answer
too?

 

Anything accepted as long as it’s not in the form of “make it work”. :)

 

Br,

 

//Andreas

 

----------------------------------

Co-Founder

+46727253995

http://2PintSoftware.com

http://twitter.com/AndHammarskjold 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  _____  


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected
by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and
then delete it from your computer.

 

 

 




Reply via email to