Correct. But, the latest update is actually an msu and available in the WSUS catalog which is a bit different than previous WUA updates so it can be delivered via the normal update process.
J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 12:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 But it ONLY updates itself from WSUS if you have windows updates enabled on the machines which we know will cause unexpected reboots so there’s a big catch 22 there. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 11:45 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 The WUA was explicitly designed to update itself from WSUS or Windows Update though and has done so successfully on every Windows installation since Windows 2000 SP4 that communicates with WSUS or Windows Update. If this were an issue, the Windows Update ecosystem would have had issues long, long ago. J From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 4:05 AM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 I'm betting he's referring to the fact that you are updating the WUA using the. ..WUA. I would agree that's not great, except that this update doesn't install until you reboot, so it should be fine in my opinion. Kind of like updating the Configmgr client with ConfigMgr, depending on how you do it out may not work well. -----Original Message----- From: Freddy Grande [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 12:09 AM Eastern Standard Time To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 I feel like you’re leaving us hanging. Why shouldn’t this update be deployed through WSUS? Freddy From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2015 10:08 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 Yes This is marked as an optional update but really should be higher. Also while it can be deployed via WSUS there are reasons why it should be deployed via software distribution From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus Sent: 03 June 2015 13:03 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Windows update KB https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 That looks like finally some help on the memory issue with the wsus agent https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265 -R The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
