One thing I will add to this is that when they shut down the AP for none 
payment of license they brick the device.  I was told they could turn it back 
on later but to you it would be a brick.
 
Jon
 
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Opinions on the Best wireless - Meraki | Ruckus | Cisco 
| Aruba | other?
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:20:22 -0400




You should be able to get a Meraki pretty easy for free by "attending" an 
online seminar.  That said Meraki has a licensing issue, at least to me, that 
requires you to keep the license paid or they shutdown the AP.  If you are 
willing to go that route then having control web based (outside web site that 
they own) is nice.  Reports they generate can be customized to some degree, and 
their web site will report when you have an outage to email and maybe SMS.  A 
nice touch to this is you can turn on a separate VLAN just for guests that have 
different connection keys.
 
Jon
 

 
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] Opinions on the Best wireless - Meraki | Ruckus | Cisco | 
Aruba | other?
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:46:13 +0000









I'm shopping for a new internal wireless solution and was wondering if anyone 
here has opinions on what's the best gear right now.
I've been looking at traditional Cisco gear(55xx controllers, 37xx APs), 
Meraki, Ruckus, and Aruba is on my list to look at.
Everything seems to have pluses and minuses. 
 
Does anyone have opinions on what gear they like, what to avoid?
 
 
 
Thanks,
Jon
 




Jon Derrenbacker | CISSP | Sr. Systems Engineer | Manager | Keiter

4401 Dominion Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Glen Allen, VA 23060


phone: 804-273-6221 | fax: 804-747-3632 | keitercpa.com


Encrypted File Upload



Experience |  Knowledge |
Relationships |
Insight
Unless the above message (“this message”) expressly provides that the 
statements contained therein and in any attachments thereto
 (“the statements”) are intended to constitute written tax advice within the 
meaning of IRS Circular 230 § 10.37, the sender intends by this message  to 
communicate general information for discussion purposes only, and you should 
not, therefore, interpret the
 statements to be written tax advice or rely on the statements for any purpose. 
 The sender will conclude that you have understood and acknowledged this 
important cautionary notice unless you communicate to the sender any questions 
you may have in a direct
 electronic reply to this message.
Note: This communication, including any attachments, may contain privileged or 
other confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or 
believe
 you have received this communication in error, do not print, copy, retransmit, 
disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained within.  Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you 
are not the intended recipient,
 please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the 
original message.
 
                                                                                
  

Reply via email to