Some really great thoughts here. Thanks everyone!
Keep it coming if anyone has more input.
Also, for those running 802.11ac(both APs and clients), what speed are you 
seeing?

Just to reply to some of the questions and comments:

>Two strikes, and Meraki is out.
>They have the ability to shut down your infrastructure.
>They host the web site that controls your infrastructure.

I agree, that does bother me.


>Doesn't Meraki automatically update units, without any real reporting behind 
>it?

One thing that bothers me about auto-firmware updates is what if someone hacked 
Meraki, planted 'special' firmware and set APs to upgrade to it. Is that not 
possible? From a hackers point of view, they hack 1 company and then get access 
to 10's of thousands of companies. In the traditional world, if someone hacked 
Cisco and uploaded some bad ios images, they might get 50 guys upgrading that 
day who don't already have the code downloaded. But if all Meraki APs call home 
every day? I'm sure it's extremely unlikely though.


>What are the features that you're looking for?

#1 is security. I want something that's as secure as wireless can be. I'm 
thinking it will at a minimum tie into Radius with AD authentication and 
certificates. I'm still learning wireless security(have AD/Radius/PKI setup in 
the lab right now), so any insight is more than welcome.
#2 is speed. Most of our apps are written to be used on high speed 
LANs(bandwidth hogs), so the faster the better.
Related to that, about 1/3rd of end-user laptops will be 802.11ac this year, 
and 100% within 2 years.


>Take a look at Ubiquiti https://www.ubnt.com/enterprise/
>We are replacing Cisco at %dayjob% with this. I have used this elsewhere as 
>well with good results.

Looks like a lot of people are saying to try Ubiquiti. Are there any features 
missing in Ubiquiti that you had with Cisco?


>I have experience with Ruckus, Cisco, and HP – Ruckus does its job very well 
>at a good price point, it has a lot of features, and easy to use.  Cisco is 
>absolutely rock solid (you could stake your job on its reliability) but you do 
>pay for it up front and with SmartNET.
>I’d recommend getting some demo equipment, play with it, see what you like and 
>what you don’t.  Some like it more technical, others more point-and-click easy.

Thanks, that's good to hear. I had never heard of Ruckus until yesterday. Seems 
like almost no one has heard of them which makes me nervous.
Speaking of demo gear, I’m collecting it now. I just got a demo Ruckus AP and 
controller in the mail today and I have a Meraki M34 on its way. We'll see…




Thanks everyone,
Jon

 [cid:[email protected]]

Jon Derrenbacker | CISSP | Sr. Systems Engineer | Manager | Keiter
4401 Dominion Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Glen Allen, VA 23060
phone: 804-273-6221 | fax: 804-747-3632 | 
keitercpa.com<http://www.keitercpa.com/>
Encrypted File Upload<https://keitercpa.sharefile.com/r/rff820ebe11a43e38>

Experience |  Knowledge | Relationships | Insight
Unless the above message (“this message”) expressly provides that the 
statements contained therein and in any attachments thereto (“the statements”) 
are intended to constitute written tax advice within the meaning of IRS 
Circular 230 § 10.37, the sender intends by this message  to communicate 
general information for discussion purposes only, and you should not, 
therefore, interpret the statements to be written tax advice or rely on the 
statements for any purpose.  The sender will conclude that you have understood 
and acknowledged this important cautionary notice unless you communicate to the 
sender any questions you may have in a direct electronic reply to this message.
Note: This communication, including any attachments, may contain privileged or 
other confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or 
believe you have received this communication in error, do not print, copy, 
retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained within.  
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email 
and destroy all copies of the original message.











Reply via email to