I did not think so either FWIW but we had our phones on a different subnet and
there was no need for external access for them so we did not need a second
scope for them.
Jon
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:51:08 -0700
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC Clients
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> I don't believe so.
>
> All a reservation does is give you a specific IP address out of a
> scope (based on the requesting MAC address), and it's the scope (or
> the global) settings that determine what settings the machine
> receives.
>
> I don't believe there's a way to specify that two sets of machines in
> a single scope get different settings for the same configuration item
> - i.e., I don't think a single scope can hand out two different
> default gateway (aka router) settings based on some different
> criteria.
>
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It has been a while but can this be done by using reservations? I never had
> > to worry about phones or tablets the last time I actually had to do DHCP.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:43:40 +0100
> > Subject: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC Clients
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> > HI There,
> >
> > I was looking into using Windows Server 2012 DHCP policies to assign a
> > different default gateway to all client PC's (a mixture of MACs and Windows
> > 7 and 8 and soon to be 10.
> >
> > Does anyone have any recommendations.
> >
> > Basically I want everything the same for all DHCP clients apart from the
> > default gateway.
> >
> > I would like one default gateway for IP phones, printers and other devices,
> > and a different one for Client Windows PC's, Macs, iPhones, iPads etc.
> >
> > This is to route all client internet browsable devices to our web filter,
> > and the the rest to the normal unfiltered gateway.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Graeme
> >
> >
> > --
> > Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
>
>
