You can override options at the reservation/client level (we have some on our 2012 DHCP, non-r2), but it's a lot of work if you have a lot of reservations. I like the policy based option that Graeme sent as well--that looks really cool.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 5:51 PM To: ntsysadm <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC Clients I don't believe so. All a reservation does is give you a specific IP address out of a scope (based on the requesting MAC address), and it's the scope (or the global) settings that determine what settings the machine receives. I don't believe there's a way to specify that two sets of machines in a single scope get different settings for the same configuration item - i.e., I don't think a single scope can hand out two different default gateway (aka router) settings based on some different criteria. Kurt On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > It has been a while but can this be done by using reservations? I > never had to worry about phones or tablets the last time I actually had to do > DHCP. > > Jon > > ________________________________ > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:43:40 +0100 > Subject: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC > Clients > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > HI There, > > I was looking into using Windows Server 2012 DHCP policies to assign a > different default gateway to all client PC's (a mixture of MACs and > Windows > 7 and 8 and soon to be 10. > > Does anyone have any recommendations. > > Basically I want everything the same for all DHCP clients apart from > the default gateway. > > I would like one default gateway for IP phones, printers and other > devices, and a different one for Client Windows PC's, Macs, iPhones, iPads > etc. > > This is to route all client internet browsable devices to our web > filter, and the the rest to the normal unfiltered gateway. > > Thanks in advance > > Graeme > > > -- > Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
