Wow. That's very cool. I will have to take a closer look at that. Thanks for the followup.
Kurt On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Graeme Carstairs <[email protected]> wrote: > Problem Solved. > > > DHCP policies are so simple. > > In our solution, created a policy, With Conditions "Vendor Class = Microsoft > Options" set the router to match, and all Microsoft Clients get a different > router address from all other clients. > > Way easier than V-Lans. > > Thought I would let you all know. > > > cheers > > graeme > > > On 30 July 2015 at 14:31, Miller Bonnie L. <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> If nobody ever replied, then we might not have any answer. You can't be >> expected to know EVERYTHING, unless it's your child doing the asking =) >> >> I know it's tomorrow for us, but Friday has already started in New >> Zealand. Happy Sysadmin day to all! >> >> http://sysadminday.com/ >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff >> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:47 AM >> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC >> Clients >> >> Yes, and you can do it on earlier versions too. >> >> I hadn't fiddled with DCHP in a long time, so shot my mouth off without >> checking. >> >> Silly me. >> >> Kurt >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Miller Bonnie L. >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You can override options at the reservation/client level (we have some >> > on our 2012 DHCP, non-r2), but it's a lot of work if you have a lot of >> > reservations. I like the policy based option that Graeme sent as >> > well--that >> > looks really cool. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 5:51 PM >> > To: ntsysadm <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC >> > Clients >> > >> > I don't believe so. >> > >> > All a reservation does is give you a specific IP address out of a scope >> > (based on the requesting MAC address), and it's the scope (or the global) >> > settings that determine what settings the machine receives. >> > >> > I don't believe there's a way to specify that two sets of machines in >> > a single scope get different settings for the same configuration item >> > - i.e., I don't think a single scope can hand out two different default >> > gateway (aka router) settings based on some different criteria. >> > >> > >> > Kurt >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It has been a while but can this be done by using reservations? I >> >> never had to worry about phones or tablets the last time I actually had >> >> to do DHCP. >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:43:40 +0100 >> >> Subject: [NTSysADM] Server 2012 DHCP policy for Winodws and MAC >> >> Clients >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> >> HI There, >> >> >> >> I was looking into using Windows Server 2012 DHCP policies to assign >> >> a different default gateway to all client PC's (a mixture of MACs and >> >> Windows >> >> 7 and 8 and soon to be 10. >> >> >> >> Does anyone have any recommendations. >> >> >> >> Basically I want everything the same for all DHCP clients apart from >> >> the default gateway. >> >> >> >> I would like one default gateway for IP phones, printers and other >> >> devices, and a different one for Client Windows PC's, Macs, iPhones, >> >> iPads etc. >> >> >> >> This is to route all client internet browsable devices to our web >> >> filter, and the the rest to the normal unfiltered gateway. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> Graeme >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me! >> > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
