BTW… They must not be scavenging DNS either or the machines wouldn’t be in CM.

________________________________
        John Marcum
            MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
              Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

  [H_Logo]

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of James Avery
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 3:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

We looked at IBCM, Direct Access. Customer doesn’t have the budget to do either.

I’m trying to clean up the 800 systems not able to push the clients to.



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 3:06 PM
To: '[email protected]' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

I didn’t see anyone say it was cheaper.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

Doesn’t require Enterprise over Pro, but otherwise, no idea.

Daniel Ratliff

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:50 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

How is IBCM cheaper than DA???

________________________________
        John Marcum
            MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
              Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

  [H_Logo]

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bradnan, Jerry
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

IBCM will also require a PKI environment. Does your client have PKI in place 
with appropriate CA placement?

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:42 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

IBCM instead? Just need a DMZ MP. If you don’t need patching or software 
distribution, all you need is a MP.

Daniel Ratliff

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Avery
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

Yea want to do that, but my customer doesn’t have the budget.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linkey, Mike
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

Get Direct Access setup.  Even though they are gone for long periods of time, 
if they have an internet connection, they are connected.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Avery
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 1:55 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] Cleaning up AD vs SCCM

Guys and Gals,

I’m trying to clean Active Directory since I have about 800 systems unable to 
receive the client in SCCM. However, I have an issue everyone needs to 
understand.

The issue is, we a few hundred machines that do not connect through the network 
from 3-9months at a time. The applications they use are all web based and there 
isn’t a need to log into the network.

Were still working on an asset inventory (Hopefully SCCM and ServiceNow), 
Currently no option to verify what is currently is deployed.

Thoughts on how to resolve this?

James




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.


________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.




Reply via email to