Only di discovery on AD objects that logged or changed pwd in xx number of days. Delete all non-clients from SCCM and run new discovery.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, 1:49 PM Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW… They must not be scavenging DNS either or the machines wouldn’t be in > CM. > > > * ------------------------------ * > > * John Marcum* > > MCITP, MCTS, MCSA > * Desktop Architect* > > * Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP* > * ------------------------------ * > > > > [image: H_Logo] > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James Avery > *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2015 3:46 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > We looked at IBCM, Direct Access. Customer doesn’t have the budget to do > either. > > > > I’m trying to clean up the 800 systems not able to push the clients to. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife > *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2015 3:06 PM > *To:* '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > I didn’t see anyone say it was cheaper. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff > *Sent:* Monday, December 07, 2015 1:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > Doesn’t require Enterprise over Pro, but otherwise, no idea. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Marcum, John > *Sent:* Monday, December 07, 2015 3:50 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > How is IBCM cheaper than DA??? > > > * ------------------------------ * > > * John Marcum* > > MCITP, MCTS, MCSA > * Desktop Architect* > > * Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP* > * ------------------------------ * > > > > [image: H_Logo] > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Bradnan, Jerry > *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2015 2:46 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > IBCM will also require a PKI environment. Does your client have PKI in > place with appropriate CA placement? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff > *Sent:* Monday, December 07, 2015 3:42 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > IBCM instead? Just need a DMZ MP. If you don’t need patching or software > distribution, all you need is a MP. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *James Avery > *Sent:* Monday, December 07, 2015 3:22 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > Yea want to do that, but my customer doesn’t have the budget. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Linkey, Mike > *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2015 1:59 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > Get Direct Access setup. Even though they are gone for long periods of > time, if they have an internet connection, they are connected. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *James Avery > *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2015 1:55 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] Cleaning up AD vs SCCM > > > > Guys and Gals, > > > > I’m trying to clean Active Directory since I have about 800 systems unable > to receive the client in SCCM. However, I have an issue everyone needs to > understand. > > > > The issue is, we a few hundred machines that do not connect through the > network from 3-9months at a time. The applications they use are all web > based and there isn’t a need to log into the network. > > > > Were still working on an asset inventory (Hopefully SCCM and ServiceNow), > Currently no option to verify what is currently is deployed. > > > > Thoughts on how to resolve this? > > > > James > > > > > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > > > > > > >
