Just a quick update on this topic as it was 3 weeks ago i think no-one care 
anymore about it but we've found the solution.

The December Windows Update Agent solved the issue on the pilot population we 
had (approx. 100 computers). It's now being deployed in Production and the 
numbers improved drastically.

Thanks for your help!

Jérémy SI HASSEN | InepSol | Architecte Configuration Manager, Poste de Travail 
et Data Protection Manager | +33 6 63 23 22 11 | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[btn_in_20x15]Jsihassen on Linkedin<http://fr.linkedin.com/in/jsihassen>

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Eswar Koneti
Sent: vendredi 27 novembre 2015 18:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM & WSUS - Compliance Status Weirdness

first question -->could be that,the client update status did not reach to the 
site server ? what does the client logs says ? 
updatestore.log,updatesdeployment.log  ,these logs will tell you what patches 
installed and what is missing. If the updatestore.log tells that,the updates 
you are looking for installed,you can probably try to refresh the compliance 
status using this 
link:https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc146437.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396

2nd question-->It will show as Compliant which is safe to ignore.Once the 
client install the update,it will report to site server as installed which 
inturn,the patch status for that particular machine will be changed to 
compliant .
This blog can help you with little more information 
http://eskonr.com/2015/04/sccm-2012-troubleshoot-client-software-update-issues/

Regards
Eswar Koneti
www.eskonr.com<http://www.eskonr.com>
________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] SCCM & WSUS - Compliance Status Weirdness
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:00:55 +0000
Hi everyone,

We're experiencing a weird issue on our environment.

Some machines that are targeted by ssoftware updates deployment are reporting 
as "Not Required" status in the report.
But when I look for the updates in the QuickFixEngineering WMI class we can see 
that it has been installed recently.

How come the reports shows "Not Required" and not "Installed" status?

Second question on that topic, if an update is installed by a previous 
deployment management once re-evaluated will it show as Installed or as Not 
Required?

Regards,

Jérémy SI HASSEN






Reply via email to