We go pretty thin here, but are considering going more thick again.

I’d love to know if there are any best practices.  The last time I looked into 
this – it seemed THIN with as little customization (outside of GPO) was the way 
to go.

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of ccollins9
Sent: December-02-15 11:12 PM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Plain image or fully loaded?

We go completely thin. The only thing in the image are OS updates and things 
like .net. We have sccm to manage our software and we update software fairly 
often, so we feel it's best to get the software installed fresh at build time. 
Important and big software gets installed as steps in the task sequence, this 
includes office, lync, vpn client, a/v agent, smartcard middleware, etc. Then 
once built, additional software gets installed by sccm based on collection, 
etc. One reason for this is to keep the image small for sending out to regional 
office distro points. Makes no sense to me to send the ms office software to a 
regional dp AND an image that contains that software, for example. One REALLY 
awesome feature in sccm is the ability to right click and add Windows updates 
into the image automatically, so there is really never a need to update our 
base image very often at all with a deploy/capture job.

On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, Juelich, Adam 
<acjuel...@pulaskischools.org<mailto:acjuel...@pulaskischools.org>> wrote:
Very good responses above.  We currently use a Hybrid approach except for 
certain labs (AutoCAD/Engineering) where I would use a Fat image because of the 
size and scope of applications.  All of that being said, go as Thin as 
possible.  You will thank yourself in the end.


-----------------------------------------------

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District<http://www.pulaskischools.org>

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Niall Brady 
<any...@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','any...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
good advice from the guys above, I'd also suggest you try both approaches (fat 
versus thin image), and only include updates and apps that everyone will use 
that don't change too often,
in fact i cover this in my book, also on amazon - 
http://www.amazon.com/Windows-noob-Guides-Configuration-Manager-2012/dp/9187445166/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1449000925&sr=1-1

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:49 PM, 
<christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com');>>
 wrote:

Bake updates into your reference image. (this will save you the most time per 
machine.)



If every machine gets office, bake that in as well. Plus office updates.



Only put applications that don't change often into the image ( not java, not 
flash player, not adobe reader).



This is called a "hybrid" image, not fully thin, but not thick either.



This way you can update it as often as you want to lower the number of patches 
applying during the imaging process, but you aren't pinned to updating every 
time adobe has a zero day.



If your new to OSD the following books are very useful, heck I reference them 
all the time as well:



http://www.amazon.com/Stealing-Pride-Vol-Customizations-ConfigMgr/dp/9187445034/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1448999110&sr=8-1&keywords=stealing+with+pride



http://www.amazon.com/Deployment-Fundamentals-Vol-Real-World-Infrastructure-ebook/dp/B00OI2H47S/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1



Here are some great reference sites:

http://deploymentbunny.com/



http://deploymentresearch.com/





________________________________
From: 
listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com');>
 
[listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com');>]
 on behalf of Beardsley, James 
[james.beards...@dhgllp.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','james.beards...@dhgllp.com');>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 2:26 PM
To: 
ms...@lists.myitforum.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ms...@lists.myitforum.com');>
Subject: [mssms] Plain image or fully loaded?
Whats the recommended way of building an image? We’re getting ready to start 
using OSD (previously used standalone MDT) and we’re trying to decide if we go 
with how we’ve done things in the past where we load a ton of apps that 
everyone uses on to the image and then capture it. Or, is it recommended to 
simply capture a plain OS-only image and then build apps into the task sequence 
to install afterwards? I know that everyone probably has their own method of 
building an image but I’d appreciate some insight on which one you use and why…

In our testing (granted this may have been due to the hardware of the OSD 
server vs the MDT server), we’ve found that the time it takes to do a plain 
image and then install updates and apps afterwards via TS were taking an hour 
or more for each computer. On the other hand, when we stuffed a bunch of apps 
on to the image and captured it and deployed it via MDT, we were able to image 
a computer in about 25-30 minutes. That’s quite a big discrepancy so needless 
to say, I’m having trouble convincing some within our group who are responsible 
for imaging machines all day to go with the plain image + subsequent task 
sequence method.

Could anyone provide links for recommendations on how to setup the image for 
OSD and if you have any good general OSD-related links, I’d love to see them.

Thanks,

James Beardsley | Firm Technology Group
Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

[cid:8644FC49-D5C9-45AE-B387-04FAFC0CC7A5]<http://www.dhgllp.com/>

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.






________________________________
The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.



Reply via email to