Yes, agreed The problem with HCM is that it freaks DCM out when the client auto discovers.
Sent from Outlook Mobile. Yes, it works with gmail. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:35 PM -0800, "Andreas Hammarskjöld" <jun...@2pintsoftware.com> wrote: Puh, hard to follow the thread here because of all the marketing fluff... Didn't know that riverbed supported hosted BranchCache mode. Hmmm... interesting? Got a link for me Jason? Think the only reason why it's not supported with ConfigMgr is because it doesn't make any sense to but a BC server in the branch instead of a DP. So untested=unsupported. From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich Sent: den 2 mars 2016 22:13 To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Use of Riverbeds at remote offices "...I am planning on using simple, cheaper and well proven technology" Can't argue cheaper... but simple and well proven, I'd just say that 30million Nomad licenses over 1700 customers argues nicely for "well proven". ...and I'm out. Ed Aldrich |Technical Enablement Lead 1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business Mobile: (401) 924-2293 ed.aldr...@1e.com<mailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com> | www.1e.com<http://www.1e.com/> [Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Client Mgmt MVP (2003-2016) From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:26 PM To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: RE: [mssms] Use of Riverbeds at remote offices Thanks John This customer is deploying Riverbeds as we speak. No, not in the slightest - I am not trying to run a DP on the appliance - just want to be familiar with what it can offer when it sits between the small number of DPs that we will be hosting in Azure and the clients which will largely be running BranchCache. Were I to have a branch office scenario where I needed a DP and I couldn't have a DP then I would aim to use a peer caching technology (which we are doing for free) or buy one (in this case, it likely would be a different product to Nomad) so I am planning on using simple, cheaper and well proven technology :) Jason From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: 02 March 2016 19:57 To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: RE: [mssms] Use of Riverbeds at remote offices Jeeze... that post was 5 years ago! Nobody uses Riverbeds anymore. When I did say that I liked Riverbeds it was only as a WAN accelerator not anything more. It sounds like you are trying to run a DP on the appliance. If that's the case I'm unfamiliar with that use case, probably because as I said...Nobody uses riverbeds anymore. :) If I had a branch office scenario where I needed a DP and I couldn't have a DP I'd buy nomad and be done with it. That is simple, cheap and well proven technology. ________________________________ John Marcum MCITP, MCTS, MCSA Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP ________________________________ [MVP] <https://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/overview> [MMS] <http://mmsmoa.com/> From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:29 AM To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] Use of Riverbeds at remote offices Hi there folks I was wondering if someone would have some detail on using Riverbed Steelheads with CM Agents please? We are working on a CM design with DPs at a head office location hosting BranchCache and clients at remote offices. Between them we have a number of SteelHeads and I am keen to find out more about how this scenario stands up. The customer only supports Riverbedding HTTPS traffic so the assumption is that we will be supplying the web server certs of the DPs so that they can get at the data while in transit in order to cache it As I have been BinGoogling I have found that Mr Marcum is a fan but Mr Sandys is not https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/d9ced859-9fe9-4210-9418-3b3f5e02be45/riverbed-scenario?forum=configmgrgeneral I also note that RiOS 8.5 introduced support for BranchCache in hosted mode. Now I know that CM does not support Hosted mode, running in distributed mode but should the customer implement this does anyone know if the Riverbeds then publish a service connection point? Best Wishes Jason ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. ________________________________ Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.
