On 13/04/2006, at 8:25 PM, Little Snitch Support wrote:
Dear Little Snitch users!
I just wanted to drop a short "thanks" for all the ideas and
suggestions posted here in our littlesnitch-talk list lately.
Please be assured that they do not go unnoticed - I've recorded
them all and added them to our suggestion list.
Well, seeing as you mentioned it, I've got one of my own.
Is it possible to allow new rules to override and substitute existing
rules? For example, this is a logic I often find myself following :
You open an app like firefox that does things on multiple protocols.
Straight away it triggers an alert, so you add port 80 as an allowed
port for this app. Then it browses something on https, so it
triggers a second alert. But instead of adding another port, you
decide it's a trusted app and add allow it any access it wants. The
second rule negates completely the first one.
Is it possible to have an option (maybe a preference) where a new
rule that overrides old rules deletes the old ones? So I don't end
up with 6 different rules for one app, when only the last introduced
one is useful?
Thanks for listening,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Littlesnitch-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://at.obdev.at/mailman/listinfo/littlesnitch-talk
