2014-08-04 11:49 GMT+02:00 Jachym Cepicky <[email protected]>: > Cameron > > I disagree in most of your points. > > Use case for PyWPS is the same as ZOO or 52North. If it is established > and stable, I can not tell - community has to tell. > > PyWPS is simple and focused application. Maybe we do not have web > interface, but we know, where our position is > > I have no time for this. I've forwarded it to pywps-dev list, maybe > someone else will pick this issue. > > Cheers > > Jachym >
Hi Jachym I think here the problem is maybe a too "pythonic" quickstart without any reference to a client interface. Is it possible to call one of the sample processes using any of the OSGeo Live interfaces? This way the user has something to play with and if interested, can be curious enough to try to modify the python code. Maybe it's just a matter of having a simple OpenLayers or Leaflet viewer that calls a process et voilà. Hope it helps. -- Jorge Sanz http://www.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
