I have nothing against pushing it to next release, I understand, that we are feature freeze phase right now
btw, shell I append the install script to svn/trunk already? any issue with that? I can fix the script in svn afterwards ? Jachym 2014-08-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Edwards, Ian <[email protected]>: > Hi Jachym, > > There's a typo in your build script on line 67 [1] > > wget -c "https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/aaggrchive/pywps-3.2.2.tar.gz"; > ^^^^ > > If PyWPS is not essential for one of the FOSS4G workshop then it would make > sense to wait for OSGeo Live 8.5 for better testing. > > Ian > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/jachym/0701ffcb8c7035476dd7 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angelos Tzotsos > Sent: 04 August 2014 13:47 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live > > On 08/04/2014 01:50 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> I agree with Ian. >> >> To avoid confusion I think we should perhaps update our overview and >> split up web services [1]. Now it reads: "publishing spatial data to >> the internet". That does not cover all services, nor is the list very >> understandable. >> >> I suggest split it up in data publishing services, metadata publishing >> services, processing services and other services. With a short >> explanation of what they mean with a reference to the pages describing >> the standards that we already have [2]. >> >> I believe these standards pages also need some more care. I really >> wonder if anyone who is not familiar can read those. >> >> The user with little domain-specific knowledge should probably first >> find out that what he really needs is a WPS service, and then have a >> look at the different possibilities. In fact one could argue that we >> could have a quickstart about consuming the services could be separate >> from the quickstart for configuring services... >> >> [1] http://live.osgeo.org/en/overview/overview.html >> [2] http://live.osgeo.org/en/standards/standards.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Live-demo mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo >> http://live.osgeo.org >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >> . >> > I agree that PyWPS should be included in OSGeoLive in 8.5. > > Having a better application to demonstrate its capabilities, or a quickstart > using QGIS WPS plugin would be a nice thing to have. > Same applies for Iris, a nice demonstration is what new users will see first > ;) > > Best, > Angelos > > -- > Angelos Tzotsos > Remote Sensing Laboratory > National Technical University of Athens > http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos > > _______________________________________________ > Live-demo mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo > http://live.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc > _______________________________________________ > Live-demo mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo > http://live.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc -- Jachym Cepicky e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com URL: http://les-ejk.cz GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp Give your code freedom with PyWPS - http://pywps.wald.intevation.org _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
