> The ALFS page on the website is a good example of the condition of the > site as a whole. The content there is generally outdated and there's > nothing to show the activity that's going on in the background. So, I > guess I'm curious if there is still resistance to the idea of turning > the wiki into the main site. It just may encourage developers to keep > the site more up-to-date, and in turn, encourage more in general to > participate with the project.
Speaking purely as a user, the one thing that often confuses me about projects is finding out which one is the 'latest' of several similar projects. I've found several in the past that do the same thing and I spend a while messing about to find which is the 'latest'. I guess this applies to ALFS in some ways - anyone visiting the site now would be left guessing as to whether to use nALFS or jhalfs. I personally was going to use nALFS recently until I found that the live cd uses jhalfs. So in short, yes I think a wiki would be good, especially if it meant the site was kept more up to date! Andy Beverley -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
