Le Lundi 30 Octobre 2006 19:33, Andrew Beverley a écrit : > I guess this applies to ALFS in some ways - anyone visiting the site now > would be left guessing as to whether to use nALFS or jhalfs. I > personally was going to use nALFS recently until I found that the live > cd uses jhalfs.
I was surprised last week to see that the live CD now uses jhalfs. I was surprised because last time around (6.1.1) I managed to get nalfs working and that now, all I needed was a quick system for an important task but then I faced the curve of learning how jhalfs works. And nalfs was not also included on the live CD to ease any transition. I guess due to shortage of space ! Luckily I found an already-built 6.1.1 somewhere in a virtual machine and I used that system. Cheers, Al -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
