On 6/23/10 11:33 AM, Steve Wart wrote: > Yes I noticed that you've done a huge amount of work. I asked about > the IDE because that is how I conceptualize the object model. Once I > understand that hopefully all the rest of it will come together for me. > One thing that Apple insists on when defining the user experience for > a new application is to come up with a clear statement of purpose. Not > only what it is its intended user base (casual, professional, etc.), > but also what it is explicitly not intended for. What *can't* Lively do?. > I've seen a couple of posts from Dan on his vision for Lively, but I > still wonder, is it an educational environment, or is it something > people can use to build commercial quality client-server applications? > Smalltalk evolved in rather unexpected ways I think. I don't think I'm > looking for Lively on Rails, but I am interested in applications that > appeal to mainstream development needs. > It seems to me that Lively on Seaside is a no-brainer, but perhaps I'm wrong.
Lawson _______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
