Hey Paul,

For D4580, I looked at the notes on it.

I mistook this comment:
D4488 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D4488> was completely covered by later patch
already on LLVM's master.

to indicate that D4580 was already in, so I was just trying to clear out
this ticket.

What is the complete set of patches you are waiting on?


On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Paul Osmialowski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> More on registering context on arm64. Depends on D4580 which although
> accepted, does not seem to be commited yet (I guess due to Host vs HostInfo
> problem).
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5089
>
> Files:
>   source/Plugins/Process/POSIX/CMakeLists.txt
>   source/Plugins/Process/POSIX/POSIXThread.cpp
>   source/Plugins/Process/POSIX/RegisterContextPOSIXProcessMonitor_arm64.cpp
>   source/Plugins/Process/POSIX/RegisterContextPOSIXProcessMonitor_arm64.h
>   source/Plugins/Process/Utility/CMakeLists.txt
>   source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextPOSIX_arm64.cpp
>   source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextPOSIX_arm64.h
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>
>


-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to