In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7727#125597, @emaste wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7727#125574, @ki.stfu wrote: > > > I think it will be easier to control if you skip each lldb-mi test using @ > > skipIfFreeBSD annotation. > > > I tried adding @skipIfFreeBSD on each one as it failed, but the failures are > inconsistent and different ones come up on subsequent runs. It seems like it > will just be a lot of churn for no real benefit to go that way. > > This approach makes it easy to run the lldb-mi tests with +m when we think > it's worthwhile without having to back out all of the individual annotations > each time. If it works unstable on FreeBSD you should skip it and later we can re-enable test on FreeBSD when it will be fixed. I don't see a reason to modify dotest.py file. FYI: @zturner used the same approach in r226614 <http://reviews.llvm.org/rL226614> when he was solving pexpect issue. http://reviews.llvm.org/D7727 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
