On 18 February 2015 at 14:01, Vince Harron <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We need as many tests as possible. I think that the lldb-mi tests are > incredibly valuable. Thanks to the lldb-mi team for that! > > Looking over the Linux builders, I'm noticing that the lldb-mi tests are > changing state frequently. I think that Ed should submit this change for > now. I'd also like him to disable the tests on Linux for now.
To be clear, you're advocating for adding decorators to all of the lldb-mi tests, and then having others remove them from the tests that are known-good? @skipIfFreeBSD # llvm.org/pr22411: Failure presumably due to known thread races @skipIfLinux # llvm.org/pr22411: Failure presumably due to known thread races _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
