Vince, How you think?
Thanks, Ilia On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Ilia K <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Vince, > > Sorry for delay. We can add lldb-mi folder to PATH in dotest.py (by > default) and then we be able to roll back these changes. It will look like: > >> Index: test/dotest.py >> > =================================================================== > > --- test/dotest.py (revision 230655) > > +++ test/dotest.py (working copy) > > @@ -932,14 +932,16 @@ > > >> pluginPath = os.path.join(scriptPath, 'plugins') > > pexpectPath = os.path.join(scriptPath, 'pexpect-2.4') > > + toolsLldbMiPath = os.path.join(scriptPath, 'tools', 'lldb-mi') > > >> # Put embedded pexpect at front of the load path so we ensure we > > # use that version. > > sys.path.insert(0, pexpectPath) > > >> - # Append script dir and plugin dir to the sys.path. > > + # Append script dir, plugin dir and lldb-mi dir to the sys.path. > > sys.path.append(scriptPath) > > sys.path.append(pluginPath) > > + sys.path.append(toolsLldbMiPath) > > >> # This is our base name component. > > base = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(scriptPath, os.pardir)) > > > Does it look better? > > Thanks, > Ilia > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Vince Harron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is it possible to have the application search for the needed binaries in >> specific locations instead of requiring the user to add them to the path? >> > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
