Ok I can probably take care of that then. Initializing it in the LanguageRuntime instead.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Zachary. That wasn't what the FIXME was about, and moving more > runtime specific code into target is not what is desired. This should go > into the Runtime, and get called by the dynamic loader. I don't think this > change is a change in the right direction. > > Jim > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Zachary Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Why are we putting logic for a specific language runtime in generic code? >> This doesn't seem right to me. >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:38 AM Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: >> lgtm >> >> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D8558 >> >> EMAIL PREFERENCES >> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits > -- Stephane Sezer _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
