This is a patch that I've been keeping in my branches for a while. I hit a null pointer dereference there. Looks like Ed had the same issue. I'll move the check to the beginning of the function as you suggested though.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Jim Ingham <[email protected]> wrote: > How do you get a thread that has NO frame 0? That seems weird, we always > have a register context to make frame 0... > > Anyway, if you're going to do this, add it to the "thread == NULL" checks > earlier on in the function so we can get out of the command with an > appropriate error message. If we don't have a frame 0 we probably don't have > registers so I'm not really sure how we're going to do any kind of stepping... > > Jim > > > REPOSITORY > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D8554 > > EMAIL PREFERENCES > http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits -- Stephane Sezer _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
