JDevlieghere wrote: One more thing that comes to mind: how confident are we that all existing clients send the launch/attach in parallel with the configuration requests? If we implement what you suggest, we risk a potential deadlock when a client waits for the launch/attach to complete before sending configuration requests or inversely, if the client waits for the initialized event before sending the launch/attach.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140299 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
