ashgti wrote: Looks like all the tests are passing on linux and for me locally as well.
> The only thing I don't like is that the configurationDone is now once again > implicit. In a future PR, I'd love to move the tests to a model where we > specify that explicitly after doing the breakpoints (and automatically catch > cases where someone forgets, like your PR from earlier this week). I'm happy > to sign myself up to do that work. That sounds great! I think that would help clean up the tests a bit by making it a bit more explicit about when they're done configuring things. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140331 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
