emaste wrote: > So I personally am ok with @mchoo7 doing these changes and then updating the > tests later, and maybe we can figure out a better way for re-generating that > doesn't involve patching lldb.
Yeah, this situation is a bit unfortunate, but I agree this patch improves LLDB on FreeBSD and shouldn't affect the test results (as run in and reported by CI). Hopefully we (FreeBSD LLVM community) can work on improving CI. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178306 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
