daniilavdeev wrote: > Is this going to also solve the lldb-server problem you observed, or do you > have a follow up PR to do that?
No, this change is purely an NFC. Once this patch is landed, I am going to update the main PR (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177572). > Just don't want to lose track of the motivating problem in case it comes > back or others are looking for existing fixes for it. That makes sense. To make the connection clearer, I’ve referenced the follow up PR in the commit message for this change. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179470 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
