DavidSpickett wrote:

> Expression evaluation (skipIfWasm) for the C++ tests that the "expression" 
> category doesn't cover, since that category only applies to 
> commands/expression/*.

We could have added more tests to that category instead, if we care about the 
category being accurate that is. Which it looks like we don't given that all 
these tests weren't in it in the first place :) Best leave it to someone who 
has a system where you'd never ever have expressions to improve it if they're 
going to use it seriously.

And these wasm skips will hopefully be gone one day anyway, but I thought I'd 
mention the alternative.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204255
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to